Saturday, August 14, 2010

Amendment X

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

The above is the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution. While it's easy enough to understand, even more simply it means: "Hey States--the Congress has 18 things it can do and that's it. Anything else--it's up to your or your citizens." Our current President once described our Constitution as a "charter of negative liberties; says what the states can't do to you, what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government must do on your behalf." For possibly the first time in my life, I agree with Barack Obama.

He's right. The Constitution says what the federal government can't do to you. Where Obama and I (or any conservative or libertarian) go our separate ways is why our founding documents contain those words. Obama looks at it as "...the Constitution reflected an enormous blindspot in this culture that carries on into this day and that the Framers had this same blindspot." He goes on to say the Constitution "...reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day." The problem with this line of thinking is it's, well, wrong. It was by design the U.S. Constitution limited the federal government. The Founders came here from a country that controlled every aspect of their lives (interesting parallel: a few months back the EPA held a contest where people were supposed to make a video showing how great it was that no part of their lives went untouched by government regulation). Read through the Declaration of Independence sometime, it lists over twenty different reasons for breaking away from England's oppressive and tyrannical King George III. The Founders wrote the Declaration, and later the Constitution, in order to free themselves and all Americans from an overbearing government.

The Founders limited the federal government on purpose, effectively creating States that could become laboratories for good ideas. If the people living there didn't like something they could "vote with their feet" and move away. If people from one state thought another state had a good thing going, they could head on over and reap the perceived rewards. A very basic example would be New York vs. New Jersey and their respective income tax rates. In New Jersey, someone making under $35,000 is taxed at 1.75%. In New York, the same income is taxed at 6.85%. Those looking to escape New York's high taxes can flee to New Jersey and retain nearly 5% more of their money. And when you're only making $35K, that 5% is pretty important. That was the design. The federal tax rate for $35,000 is 25%. You don't like it? Tough. The only way to escape that is to leave the country. This can be applied to anything the federal government does and any program they run--they're inescapable.

I was going to close this post by saying something akin to "What Obama doesn't understand is the Founders didn't "miss" something when they wrote the Constitution, they left it out intentionally." The problem with that sentence is it's not that Obama doesn't understand what the Founders did, it's that he doesn't like it. And you know what? That's fine. Contained in the Constitution is a way to change the Constitution--through the amendment process. If he believes the government should provide healthcare (which he does), create an amendment. If he wants the federal government to provide student loans (which through the new healthcare law, it does), add an amendment. If he wants control of General Motors (check), write an amendment. The problem is he's done all of the above without going through the amendment process, not only destroying State's rights in the process, but circumventing the Constitution completely.

Obama may not agree with our Founder's decision to limit federal power, but as it stands, anything not enumerated to the Congress by the eighteen powers are left to the states. This was no accident.

14 comments:

  1. Very interesting lesson on American constitutional history, thanks. A few comments from afar.
    Firstly: states here, and maybe there too, are past their use-by date. They soak up vast amounts of tax with varying returns (predominantly wasted on red tape and duplication of bureaucracy). Returns are reduced to revenue raising rorts in many cases, which then pay bureaucrats' wages...etc etc.
    Secondly: I find it hugely ironic/sad that in seeking to FREE themselves of the shackles of English constraints (a worthy cause), the founders spawned excessive freedoms (eg gun laws) which have in turn led to further social decay.
    Oh the tangled webs we weave.
    I would appreciate any comments/thoughts you have on any of my comments so far in this blog. Even though I do not agree with much of what you say, you write extremely well, and clearly have an excellent grasp of your subject matter. Passion for something is always better than apathy. JUDE

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're correct about states soaking up vast amounts of tax dollars. I'm unfamiliar with how Australia is set up, but over here the original intent was NEVER for the federal government to redistribute wealth between the states (by taxing all equally but reimbursing unequally)--which is exactly what it does. If Congress stuck to the eighteen things it is SUPPOSED to do and didn't screw about with home loans, monetary policy, social security, healthcare etc., the U.S. wouldn't be going broke as it would have plenty of cash for its few legitimate activities. The states were designed to rise and fall on their own--the fed shouldn't be bailing out California with Idaho's tax dollars.
    I have a problem with your "excessive freedoms" idea concerning gun laws, specifically how they've led to further social decay. I own three shotguns, three handguns and a .22 rifle. I use the shotguns for hunting birds, the handguns for target practice as well as protection and the .22 was a gift from my grandfather when I turned 1 (yep, one year-old). The problem is not the weapons themselves, it's WHO is holding them. If guns were banned in America, people like me would no longer have them but those in gangs and organized crime would. Would that make us safer or more socially responsible? I submit it would not.

    Lastly, liberty is defined as a maximum absence of coercion from government. The 10 Amendments ensure that liberty, even though for the last 100 years the government has done its best to quash it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I concur with most of what you say. But re the guns, yes it's the owners and not the guns. Our federal laws were changed in 1996 after a nutter killed 37 people. I think we are better for it...a sacrifice for some, but better for the greater good! The USA has one of the highest death rates due to guns in the world.
    And it's not just the gun laws that I worry about, but that's enough for now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sometimes, some decisions by the government do really prove to be beneficial for the citizens. Being one of the college essay writers in UK, I agree with the fact that congress should have minimum interference in the country affairs. I may not be a political expert but I understand what is good and what is bad in politics, mhmm.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ISI Journal Publications journals service niche and broader communities of researchers are all over the world. We allow the students to get academic publication services and research paper editing services. Due to the insufficient resources, much effective research often gets lost when it comes to finding the authentic platform for the publication of journals and research papers. This is where our publication support service comes in to support you. In order to maximize the experience of our clients, we offer value-added services. ISI Journal Publications is the most authentic and reliable publishers that helps you to get recognition for your research.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maintaining your anonymity: We maintain full anonymity over the identity of all our clients. As a result, no one will ever know that you got a research paper Pay Someone To Do Research Paper written from us. Furthermore, you will own the papers that we write for you, and they will not be sold or even shown to any other client.

    ReplyDelete
  7. An addition or alteration made to a constitution, statute, or legislative bill or resolution. Amendments can be made to existing constitutions and statutes and are also commonly made to bills in the course of their passage through a legislature.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great blog! I have o through all the content of this blog.This is really helpful and informative for me.If you are looking to buy an online men tshirt at a cheap rate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The purposeful limits placed on the federal government by the Founders led to the creation of States that may serve as innovation hubs Accounting Services In UAE. People might "vote with their feet" and leave if they didn't like something there.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I largely agree with what you have to say. But with regards to the guns, it is the owners and not the weapons. Our publication support Masters Green Jacket service can help you in this situation. We provide value-added services that maximize the client experience.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Our publication support service can help you in this situation. We provide value-added Auditing Firm Near Me services to maximize the client experience. Constitutional and statutory amendments are possible, and they are frequently made to bills as they move through a legislature.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Much valuable research is frequently lost due to a lack of resources when it comes to locating a genuine publication site for journals and Small Business Accountant. Our publication support service can help you in this situation.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The principle of federalism, as outlined in the 10th Amendment, underscores the importance of states' rights and individual freedoms. It's vital that decisions such as cavity wall insulation removal remain within the purview of states or individuals, as not expressly dictated by the Constitution.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Absolutely! This foundational principle, often referred to as the Tenth Amendment, underscores the importance of state sovereignty. It emphasizes that any powers not expressly granted to the federal government by the Constitution are retained by the states or the people themselves. This includes matters such as managing ace pools

    ReplyDelete